Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 21:43:35 GMT -6
There is a big difference between “being authentic” and “being perceived authentic” . The first is an internal virtue and consists in finding the perfect harmony between being and appearing. It is not a simple thing, because it must be based on in-depth self-knowledge and the ability to make this awareness coherent with the communication you have online and offline. Otherwise, "being perceived as authentic" consists of communicating in a very specific direction, in the hope that others will understand exactly what we want them to perceive.
Given the extreme complexity of the matter, I believe that it is India Mobile Number Data better for you to understand well what your true nature is and for you to follow it to channel the perceptions you want to convey. Managing an artificial presence built on a model distant from your true essence could become too complex. Being authentic is not enough Being authentic and not being able to communicate it is a real tragedy. Communication is made up of a good dose of technique, it is not enough to know your job or be a delightful and generous person. If you don't communicate it clearly you will be misunderstood or even transmit perceptions that are contrary to who you really are. What is authenticity from the point of view of those who perceive it People are lazy and distracted, so it's up to you to be clear and effective in your communication. There are behaviors you can adopt to appear authentic; the first is to build your brand around your message . You must have something that makes you unique and recognisable.
To do this you must be profoundly consistent in your communication of values, ethics and empathy. These values can be inserted into any content to attract the attention of an audience. These values will be perceived in detail with respect to the topic you decide to deal with. Authenticity is not only attributable to the content, but also to the style and communication register you adopt. Is a strategy necessary to appear authentic or can you freely follow your heart? The biggest communication mistakes I have seen were made by following instinct (which some incorrectly call “heart”). Instinct is useful, but it must be channeled in the direction you want to give your communication.
Given the extreme complexity of the matter, I believe that it is India Mobile Number Data better for you to understand well what your true nature is and for you to follow it to channel the perceptions you want to convey. Managing an artificial presence built on a model distant from your true essence could become too complex. Being authentic is not enough Being authentic and not being able to communicate it is a real tragedy. Communication is made up of a good dose of technique, it is not enough to know your job or be a delightful and generous person. If you don't communicate it clearly you will be misunderstood or even transmit perceptions that are contrary to who you really are. What is authenticity from the point of view of those who perceive it People are lazy and distracted, so it's up to you to be clear and effective in your communication. There are behaviors you can adopt to appear authentic; the first is to build your brand around your message . You must have something that makes you unique and recognisable.
To do this you must be profoundly consistent in your communication of values, ethics and empathy. These values can be inserted into any content to attract the attention of an audience. These values will be perceived in detail with respect to the topic you decide to deal with. Authenticity is not only attributable to the content, but also to the style and communication register you adopt. Is a strategy necessary to appear authentic or can you freely follow your heart? The biggest communication mistakes I have seen were made by following instinct (which some incorrectly call “heart”). Instinct is useful, but it must be channeled in the direction you want to give your communication.